An update on the allegations of impropriety at the National Office relative to contracts was presented. [NAME], former National President, and [NAME], both attorneys, were asked to lead the investigation. They looked at the allegations, collected documents, interviewed people and sent the summary of that information to [NAME], CPA, Chair of the Audit Committee. The results were presented to the Board of Directors. The Board voted that there was no merit to the allegations.
Why choose a former national president to investigate problems that may have originated under his tenure?