Politickles

In a new book called Faith of the Fatherless, [Paul] Vitz examines the psychology of atheism and concludes that the unwillingness of such noted figures as Voltaire, Nietzsche, Sigmund Freud, and Bertrand Russell to believe in a personal, loving God can be traced to defective relationships with their own fathers. — F.R. Duplantier, Behind The Headlines, 1999

From 1995 to 2001, I wrote a nationally syndicated daily radio and newspaper commentary called “Behind The Headlines,” applying the principles of free enterprise, limited government, and traditional morality to the issues of the day. It was the best job I ever had. My boss was Phyllis Schlafly, the best boss I ever had.

I frequently devoted commentaries to the latest, most provocative books coming out of the new conservative publishing houses (and imprints) that were popping up all over back then. One such book was Paul Vitz’s Faith of the Fatherless, to which I devoted two commentaries: the one excerpted above, and a second. I subsequently had the opportunity to interview Vitz when I sat in for Phyllis on her Saturday morning radio show, “Phyllis Schlafly Live.”

J. Budziszewski admits that his nihilism was motivated in part by his desire to “get back” at God “for the various things which predictably went wrong in my life after I had lost hold of Him.” He confesses, as well, that he “had come to confuse science with a certain world view . . . that nothing is real but matter.” Budziszewski emphasizes, however, that “the main reason” for his nihilism was “sheer, mulish pride. I didn’t want God to be God; I wanted J. Budziszewski to be God.” — F.R. Duplantier, “Behind The Headlines,” 2000

The Revenge of Conscience by J. Budziszewski was another of the books I featured in a “Behind The Headlines” commentary, Budziszewski another of the authors I got to interview as a guest host on Phyllis Schlafly’s Saturday morning radio program. Like Paul Vitz, author of Faith of the Fatherless, Budziszewski went through an extended period of doubt and disbelief before regaining the faith of his childhood. Like Chesterton, Budziszewski has a gift for turning phrases, and his book is full of great lines. My favorite is this one: “Not many of us doubt God’s existence and then start sinning. Most of us sin and then start doubting. . . .”

Secular humanists are committed to the use of reason and science to understand the world. We also believe it’s necessary to develop a new morality appropriate to the present needs. I believe in the use of reason to build a good life on this planet without the illusion of salvation or immortality. — Paul Kurtz, Prometheus Press

In 1987 I published a lengthy article entitled “Free to Serve,” about Paul Kurtz and his Prometheus Press, and in 1998 recycled a small portion of it as a “Behind The Headlines” commentary. I never had the opportunity to interview Kurtz, nor wanted it. What sort of man persists in espousing a philosophy that led to the murder of 200 million people by socialist governments in the 20th Century? What wisdom can such a person possibly offer? What’s to be gained from a conversation with the devil?

In a new book called Faith of the Fatherless, [Paul] Vitz examines the psychology of atheism and concludes that the unwillingness of such noted figures as Voltaire, Nietzsche, Sigmund Freud, and Bertrand Russell to believe in a personal, loving God can be traced to defective relationships with their own fathers. — F.R. Duplantier, Behind The Headlines, 1999

From 1995 to 2001, I wrote a nationally syndicated daily radio and newspaper commentary called “Behind The Headlines,” applying the principles of free enterprise, limited government, and traditional morality to the issues of the day. It was the best job I ever had. My boss was Phyllis Schlafly, the best boss I ever had.

I frequently devoted commentaries to the latest, most provocative books coming out of the new conservative publishing houses (and imprints) that were popping up all over back then. One such book was Paul Vitz’s Faith of the Fatherless, to which I devoted two commentaries: the one excerpted above, and a second. I subsequently had the opportunity to interview Vitz when I sat in for Phyllis on her Saturday morning radio show, “Phyllis Schlafly Live.”

Maybe you don’t believe in the power of prayer. If you’ve lost your faith, or never had it, but would like a convincing demonstration of the power of prayer, then this challenge is for you. Find today’s date on the calendar. Flip six months ahead and mark that date. Now, starting today, pray for faith. Pray for faith every day, at least once a day, for six months. Pray sincerely, pray with all your heart, and one day — on or before the date you’ve marked — you’ll suddenly notice that all your doubts have vanished. In their place you’ll find an abiding faith, and you’ll never question again the power of prayer. — F.R. Duplantier

I actually did this in my mid-twenties. Having convinced myself that I didn’t need a “crutch,” I stopped going to church when I was 15 and began a lengthy period of unconscious moral decline — which culminated, fortunately, in an epiphany in which I recognized, and summoned the courage to admit, that I had become a moral cripple. I did need a crutch, after all. The seemingly insurmountable problem was that I no longer had any faith. I wasn’t a staunch unbeliever, merely an agnostic (never have understood how anyone could affirm God’s nonexistence), but the unquestioning faith I’d known as a child was utterly gone. How could I get it back?

The solution was paradoxical: I would pray for it. It seemed like a crazy idea, especially for an intensely logical person like me. How could I pray when I didn’t really believe in God, much less the efficacy of prayer? Why would God listen to the prayers of a faithless person like me? It was illogical, it didn’t make any sense, but I didn’t know what else to do. So I prayed.

It wasn’t much of a prayer, either, for I’d forgotten how to pray. I just asked for my faith back. Please, God, let me believe again.

I did that every day, several times a day, for weeks or months — I’m not sure how long, because I have no idea exactly when my faith was restored. I never could pinpoint the precise moment, because it came back quite unobtrusively. I just happened to notice one day that the doubt was gone, completely gone, never to return. Where the emptiness had been, there was fullness. It was a nice feeling.

Five more years passed before I actually ventured into a church again, but I had begun the journey home.

There was a time in the history of the homosexual movement when their demand was for “tolerance.” That time has passed. Now, homosexual activists have completely reversed themselves and routinely demand an aggressive intolerance — for any viewpoints that disagree with theirs, that is. And what’s shocking is that, in many cases, large organizations are bowing to such demands. – Peter Sprigg

Tolerance for Bigots?

The Intolerance of the “Tolerant”

The Truth Will Set You Free!

The Communism of today, more emphatically than similar movements in the past, conceals in itself a false messianic idea. A pseudo-ideal of justice, of equality and fraternity in labor impregnates all its doctrine and activity with a deceptive mysticism, which communicates a zealous and contagious enthusiasm to the multitudes entrapped by delusive promises. This is especially true in an age like ours, when unusual misery has resulted from the unequal distribution of the goods of this world. – Pius XI

Over the next several decades, Christianity will become a faith that can speak in the public square less and less freely. A society where faith is prevented from vigorous public expression is a society that has fashioned the state into an idol. And when the state becomes an idol, men and women become the sacrificial offering. – Charles Chaput

Coming to America

“Studying the Shroud to produce the 3D face of Jesus, we encountered scientific evidence that the resurrection was a real physical event that happened in a moment of time 2,000 years ago.” – Ray Downing

Science will eventually prove our common parentage in Adam and Eve, the Flood and Noah’s Ark, and all the other stories of the Bible. When it does, there will still be disbelievers.

No subject is taboo to free thinkers — no subject but one, belief in God. For atheism is the opiate of the intellectuals, whose minds are thereby dulled to every token of divinity. The faithful will be outcasts in the new order, and the measure of the “freedom” of what will pass for thought will be the fervency of one’s nonbelief. . . .

Will our enlightened brethren suffer us to exist as harmless anomalies and quaint anachronisms? Afraid not. No, our faith is a constant challenge to their infidelity; it makes them feel bad. We’ll just have to go. You see, humanists cannot be truly free until all belief and all believers are exterminated. – F.R. Duplantier, “Free to Serve,” 1987

Secular humanists are committed to the use of reason and science to understand the world. We also believe it’s necessary to develop a new morality appropriate to the present needs. I believe in the use of reason to build a good life on this planet without the illusion of salvation or immortality. — Paul Kurtz, Prometheus Press

In 1987 I published a lengthy article entitled “Free to Serve,” about Paul Kurtz and his Prometheus Press, and in 1998 recycled a small portion of it as a “Behind The Headlines” commentary. I never had the opportunity to interview Kurtz, nor wanted it. What sort of man persists in espousing a philosophy that led to the murder of 200 million people  by socialist governments in the 20th Century? What wisdom can such a person possibly offer? What’s to be gained from a conversation with the devil?

J. Budziszewski admits that his nihilism was motivated in part by his desire to “get back” at God “for the various things which predictably went wrong in my life after I had lost hold of Him.” He confesses, as well, that he “had come to confuse science with a certain world view . . . that nothing is real but matter.” Budziszewski emphasizes, however, that “the main reason” for his nihilism was “sheer, mulish pride. I didn’t want God to be God; I wanted J. Budziszewski to be God.” — F.R. Duplantier, “Behind The Headlines,” 2000

The Revenge of Conscience by J. Budziszewski was another of the books I featured in a “Behind The Headlines” commentary, Budziszewski another of the authors I got to interview as a guest host on Phyllis Schlafly’s Saturday morning radio program. Like Paul Vitz, author of Faith of the Fatherless (see yesterday’s post), Budziszewski went through an extended period of doubt and disbelief before regaining the faith of his childhood. Like Chesterton, Budziszewski has a gift for turning phrases, and his book is full of great lines. My favorite is this one: “Not many of us doubt God’s existence and then start sinning. Most of us sin and then start doubting. . . .”